A failed attempt to prove Mark Twain wrong

 

Mark Twain is famous for his quote "Buy land they aren't making any more of it".

This is an under-edited post exploring the costs of making more floating land out of fibreglass boxes that you can then have sitting in the ocean.
Living in Britain the cost of land is very high, at least compared to any kind of global average. I've been wondering if a super low-cost construction on the water could ever be cheaper.

Starting with some reference numbers:

https://www.travisperkins.co.uk/mdf-hardboard-and-pinboard/standard-hardboard-panel-2440mm-x-1220mm-x-3mm/p/500013

8.36/sheet


https://www.mbfg.co.uk/225gm_csm.html

2080 for 16*120m rolls 0.95m width 225gsm

1.14 GBP/ m^2

https://www.cfsnet.co.uk/acatalog/Web_FibreglassGuide.pdf

Google claims this source says 2 layers for 300gsm


https://www.travisperkins.co.uk/planed-softwood-timber/redwood-planed-square-edge-5th-25-x-50mm-finished-size-20-5-x-44mm/p/180032

Beams at 2GBP/meter


8 sheets

4 beams 2440


4 screws per panel


Cost of mold

8*8.36 + 4*2.440*2 = 86.4


Cost of fibreglass:


Surface area is 8*1220*2440 = 23.81 m^2


4 wraps:

4*23.81 * 1.14 = 108.57


Resin is probably twice the cost of the fibreglass

2*108.57



Total cost for a box

3*108.57 + 86.4 = 412.11


Total per sqrm

So even if this works it’s way more expensive than simply buying land.


At 70 per sqm, we are an order of magnitude away from our goal.

In bulk, British farmland costs 6k per acre

We are currently at 280k per acre


Halving the cost still doesn’t even get us close.


There are advantages to our approach in that we aren’t limited to farm use etc. There are also drawbacks, we don’t have a ground to dig into, except the ocean floor obviously.

https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/106330484#/?channel=COM_BUY

Using the non-aggregate land cost we get 


This is a much more manageable target we only need to get about 6 times cheaper.


If the resin doesn’t cost 3 times the fibreglass and we don’t do 4 layers well a low ball estimate for this could be


3 wraps and resin cost in line with fibreglass cost, with a mould that is reusable



3*23.81 * 1.14  * 2 = 163

Still way too high but we are closing in on the 42k/acre




86.4 + 23.81 * 1.14  * 2 = 140



We are going quite large on the surface area so I wonder if we drop that down how much we could save


 4*2.440*2+ 5*8.36 =61.32


2440*300*4+2*(2440*2440)= 14.84m^2

14.84*1.14*2 + 61.32 = 95GBP/4 by 4

That actually gets us really close to the cost of land on a small scale even if we end up with quite flimsy (because of the single sheet) and not as buoyant construction.


4*2.440*2+ 4.5*8.36 = 57.14


2440*300*4+2*(2440*2440)= 14.84m^2

14.84*1.14*2 + 61.32 = 95GBP/4 by 4


Making it even more flimsy to really push the boat out, pardon the pun, and have the mould taken out we can get down to

14.84*1.14*2 = 33.84

We are still above the cost of land in bulk but at least we have got to a point which is cheaper.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An exploration in number systems

For most people, the denary system of numbers is perfectly natural. So much so that people don’t even give other options a second thought. The alternatives are not just hypothetical but are in their own way ingrained in our culture. What is the denary system of numbers? Denary from the Latin decem for ten, is a system of numbers where we have 10 symbols 0 to 9. For this, we use a positional number system based on powers of 10. Each column to the left has a value 10 times that to the right. The number 1000 is: Thousands Hundreds Tens units 1 0 0 0 This isn’t the only system that could be used and in fact, 10 is special only in the sense that we have 10 fingers. If the number of fingers isn’t taken into account then base 12 would make arithmetic a lot simpler. Instead of a 10s column you have a dozens, instead of 100s you have 144s. For this you ofcourse need more symbols. 10 is represented with the symbol A and 11 is represented with the symbol B. 12 is re
Read more

Structural engineering with cardboard

Image
Moving into a new flat I have ended up with a lot of cardboard and have actually struggled to get it to all be taken away. I then saw this Kickstarter on hacker news which introduced me to the idea that I could perhaps use the cardboard I had been throwing away the whole time. I have been toying with some ideas for building myself a robot, or at least a robot arm but they seem to be just ludicrously expensive and still not able to lift much weight. One of the problems with the advancement of robotics is that although processing power has come down in price at a rate that no other product ever has, the cost of actuators (The motion inducing components like motors) has remained largely the same. I want to explore an idea I have for using cheaper motors in a robotic arm in another post though. The problem I want to look at here is the possibility of being able to use cardboard, a material which can almost be considered to have a negative price, as the structure to the robot. I love the
Read more